Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
European journal of inflammation ; 20, 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2126114

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to investigate the expression of pyroptosis-related factors (NLRP3, IL-18, NF-κB, HMGB-1, and GSDMD) in patients who died of COVID-19. The expression levels of NLRP3, IL-18, NF-κB, HMGB-1, and GSDMD in lung and spleen tissues of the COVID-19 group and the control group were detected by tissue immunofluorescence. The control group includes lung tissues and spleen tissues of two patients who died unexpectedly without SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the COVID-19 group includes the lung and spleen tissues of three patients who died of SARS-CoV-2 virus infection. The positive rates of NF-κB, NLRP3, IL-18, and GSDMD in the lung tissues from the control group and COVID-19 group were 9.8% vs 73.4% (p = 0.000), 5.5% vs 63.6% (p = 0.000), 24.4% vs 76.2% (p = 0.000), and 17.5% and 46.8% (p = 0.000) respectively. The positive rates of NF-κB, NLRP3, IL-18, HMGB-1, and GSDMD in the spleen tissues from the control group and COVID-19 group were 20.6% vs 71.2% (p = 0.000), 18.9% vs 72.0% (p = 0.000), 15.2% vs 64.8% (p = 0.000), 27.6% vs 69.2% (p = 0.000), and 23% and 48.8% (p = 0.000), respectively. The positive rates of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the CD68 positive cells of the lung and spleen in the control group and COVID-19 group were 2.5% vs 56.8% (p = 0.000);3.0% vs 64.9% (p = 0.000) respectively. The rates of NF-κB positive nuclei in the control group and COVID-19 group were 13.4% vs 51.4% (p = 0.000) in the lung and 38.2% vs 59.3% (p = 0.000) in the spleen. The rates of HMGB-1 positive cytoplasm in the control and the COVID-19 group were 19.7% vs 50.3% (p = 0.000) in the lung and 12.3% vs 45.2% (p = 0.000) in the spleen. The targets of SARS-CoV-2 are the lung and spleen, where increased macrophages could be involved in the up-regulation of pyroptosis-related inflammatory factors such as NF-κB, HMGB-1, NLRP3, IL-18, and GSDMD.

2.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 40(12): 2669-2676, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1460345

ABSTRACT

The humoral and cellular immunity of convalescent COVID-19 patients is involved in pathogenesis and vaccine immunity. In this study, through CoV-psV neutralization assay and IFN-γ ELISpot testing in 30 cases of COVID-19 patients after 9 months post-SARS-CoV-2 infection, it found that the ratio of memory/naive CD4+ T lymphocytes cells and levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2-IgM and RBD-IgM were slightly but significantly higher in COVID-19 severe convalescent patients than that in non-severe patients. The specific cellular and humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 were detectable, regardless of the severity of the disease in the acute phase. This information may help understanding the immune status after SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/blood , Enzyme-Linked Immunospot Assay , Female , Humans , Immunity, Cellular , Immunity, Humoral , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/physiology
5.
Expert Rev Respir Med ; 15(4): 553-559, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1003460

ABSTRACT

Background: Little is known about changes in lymphocyte subsets after SARS-CoV-2 infection.Methods: Clinical data of 580 COVID-19 patients hospitalized in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University from 20 December 2019, to 8 March 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. The relation of lymphocyte subsets and severity or prognosis of disease were analyzed.Results: At 2-3 weeks after the onset of symptoms, lymphocyte subsets decreased to the lowest levels. The levels of lymphocyte subsets in asymptomatic patients were close to healthy persons, except for CD8+ T lymphocyte cells. The levels of lymphocyte subsets in patients with severe illness were lower than that in patients with mild-to-moderate illness (P < 0.01). Similarly, among patients with severe illness, lower levels of lymphocyte subsets were found in dead patients compared to survivors (P < 0.001). Moreover, by comparing the results of the same patients at different stages of the disease, we found levels of lymphocyte subsets were lower in the acute phase compared to that in convalescent-phase (P < 0.001). However, the levels of lymphocyte subsets in patients who had SARS-CoV-2 viral load >5000 copies/ml and 500-5000 copies/ml were at similar levels.Conclusions: Lymphocyte subsets are a good biomarker to assess the severity and prognosis of the disease at 2-3 weeks after the onset of symptoms.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/blood , Lymphocyte Subsets , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/diagnosis , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Lymphocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
6.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 33(1S Suppl 1): e176-e182, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-900650

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Liver injury in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients was poorly understood. METHODS: The markers of liver injury, severity of disease and prognosis among 495 COVID-19 patients in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University from 1st January 2019 to 11th March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (50.1 ± 38.4 vs. 31.4 ± 39.1, P < 0.001), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) (70.3 ± 70.2 vs. 34.1 ± 34.7, P < 0.001) and fibrinogen-to-albumin-ratio (FAR) (13.4 ± 4.0 vs. 10.4 ± 3.4, P < 0.001) were greater than mild COVID-19 patients, whereas the levels of albumin(35.0 ± 6.2 vs. 39.9 ± 3.7, P < 0.001) and albumin/globulin (A/G) ratio (1.21 ± 0.24 vs. 1.50 ± 0.31, P < 0.001) were lower in severe COVID-19 patients. By comparing the changes of liver injury markers 7-10 days after hospitalization, the level of albumin deteriorated from 35.0 ± 6.2 to 30.20 ± 5.5 (P < 0.001), A/G ratio from 1.21 ± 0.24 to 1.06 ± 0.25 (P < 0.001), and FAR from 13.4 ± 4.0 to 15.4 ± 2.9(P < 0.001) in severe COVID-19 patients, while the changes of albumin, A/G ratio and FAR showed opposite patterns in mild COVID-19 patients. FAR > 12 [2.566 (1.410-4.670), P = 0.012) on admission and changes of albumin >5g/l [22.489 (6.422-78.757), P = 0.001] were two risk factors for death, and the sensitivity and specificity for the poor prognosis were 80.8% and 64.0%, 82.6% and 76.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The levels of AST, GGT, albumin and FAR are correlated with disease severity after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection. FAR > 12 on admission and changes of albumin > 5 g/l were good predictors for the prognosis of COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Liver , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Expert Rev Respir Med ; 15(3): 411-417, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-900286

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To analyze characteristics of asymptomatic/pres-ymptomatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: Chest computed tomography(CT), indicators for organ and coagulation function, inflammation cytokines, of asymptomatic/pre-symptomatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were retrospectively analyzed in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University from 20 December 2019, to 8 March 2020. RESULTS: The proportion of normal chest CT in asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were 35.4% (17/48) and 3.3%(2/61), respectively (P< 0.001). In 17 asymptomatic patients, their images of chest CT maintained normal during the whole course of diseases, while the normal images of chest CT in 2 pre-symptomatic patients progressed to abnormal later (P< 0.001). All the six asymptomatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection maintained unilateral lesion, while the proportion was 29.4%(5/17) in pre-symptomatic patients(P= 0.003). Compared with asymptomatic patients, pre-symptomatic COVID-19 patients had worse levels of Lymphocyte count (P= 0.001), Albumin (P= 0.045), Aspartate aminotransferase (P= 0.044), γ-glutamyl transpeptadase (P= 0.016), Globulin (P= 0.036), Creatinine (P= 0.021), Lactate dehydrogenase (P= 0.008), C-reactive protein (P< 0.001), Serum amyloid A (P< 0.001), and Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (P< 0.001). Except for above indicators, Alkaline phosphatase (P= 0.009), Procalcitonin (P= 0.010), and D-dimer(P< 0.001) increased further during periods of symptoms compared with those levels in pre-symptomatic period. CONCLUSION: In early stage after SARS-CoV-2 infection, images of chest CT and blood tests of asymptomatic patients were different from pre-symptomatic patients.


Subject(s)
Asymptomatic Diseases , COVID-19/diagnosis , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
8.
Expert Rev Respir Med ; 15(3): 403-409, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-872888

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Information about the impact of HIV coinfection on clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients remains limited. METHODS: Maximum body temperatures, fever duration, chest CT and viral shedding, lymphocyte counts, and titer of SARS-CoV-2 antibody were compared between COVID-19 patients with and without HIV infection in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University from January 20th to February 14th, 2020. RESULTS: Compared with 53 COVID-19 patients without HIV infection, the patients with SARS-CoV-2 and HIV coinfection had higher maximum body temperatures (38.7°C vs 37.6°C, P = 0.044), longer duration of fever (8.7 ± 4.5 vs 4.2 ± 2.1 days, P = 0.038), longer time to have improvement of chest CT images (22 vs 15 days from the onset of illness, P = 0.011), lower level of SARS-CoV-2 IgG (5.11 ± 32.33 vs 37.45 ± 15.48 AU/ml, P = 0.042). However, no statistically significant difference of duration of SARS-CoV-2 shedding in the two groups was found (12.3 ± 2.6 vs 13.4 ± 2.4 days, , P = 0.813). CONCLUSION: Lower level of CD4+ T lymphocyte counts caused by HIV infection itself might be one of reasons for relatively weak ability to produce SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies. The effects of anti-HIV drugs in prevention and treatment of COVID-19 appears to be limited.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV , RNA, Viral/analysis , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Adult , China/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Virus Shedding
9.
Platelets ; 32(5): 582-590, 2021 Jul 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-786866

ABSTRACT

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is the basis of preventing stent thrombosis and ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but prolonging the duration of DAPT will increase the risk of bleeding. The optimal duration of DAPT after PCI remains controversial at present. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy and safety of short-term DAPT in patients undergoing PCI. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of science from inception to September 2019 were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials were included to compare short term (3 months or less) with a standard 12-months DAPT in patients undergoing PCI. Random effect model and fixed effect model wereused to calculate the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of each endpoint. This meta-analysis included 38479 patients undergoing PCI from 8 randomized clinical trials. No difference was observed in the risk of all-cause death (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.80-1.06, P = 0.25), cardiovascular death (RR 0.88, 0.69-1.12, P = 0.29), myocardial infarction (RR 1.05, 0.94-1.19, P = 0.38), definite or probable stent thrombosis (RR 1.05, 0.80-1.36, P = 0.73), and stroke (RR 1.02, 0.80-1.30, P = 0.89) between short term and standard DAPT. The short-term DAPT could reduce the risk of major bleeding (RR 0.67, 0.48-0.94, P = 0.02) and any bleeding (RR 0.63, 0.48-0.82, P = 0.0005) compared with 12 months of DAPT. In conclusion, the short-term DAPT can reduce the risk of bleeding compared with standard DAPT, without increasing the risk of death or ischemia (Registered by PROSPERO, CRD42020153881).


Subject(s)
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/pharmacology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
10.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 50(11): e13412, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-780853

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is a public health emergency that is spreading worldwide and seriously affecting the global economy. Data on the effectiveness and safety of the use of methylprednisolone for patients with severe COVID-19 remain limited. METHODS: In this retrospective study, epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, treatment and outcomes data of hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University from January 1 to 7 March 2020, were collected. Binary logistic regression model was used to analyse risk factors for disease progression from severe COVID-19 illness to critical illness. The effectiveness and safety of the use of methylprednisolone for patients with severe COVID-19 disease were evaluated. RESULTS: The results of the multivariate analysis from 175 patients with severe COVID-19 indicate that the use of methylprednisolone was a protective factor against disease progression from severe to critical illness(P < .001; OR: 0.054 95% CI: 0.017-0.173). Among patients with severe COVID-19 aged < 65 years, both the proportion of patients who progressed to critical illness (42.2% vs 90.0%, P = .000) and the mortality(6.7% vs 30.0%, P = .002) were lower for patients in methylprednisolone group, compared with those in the non-methylprednisolone group, whereas no statistical differences between the methylprednisolone group and the non-methylprednisolone group were found among patients with COVID-19 older than 65 years. Moreover, both the levels of CD4+ T lymphocyte counts (646 vs 463/µL, P = .007) and IL-6 (241.9 vs 82.8 pg/mL, P = .025) were higher among patients with severe COVID-19 aged < 65 years, compared with those patients ≥ 65 years old. CONCLUSION: Data from the limited sample showed that the early use of low or medium doses of methylprednisolone has a positive effect for patients with severe COVID-19 younger than 65 years old, and excessive immune response and cytokine storm may be some of the reasons for the effectiveness.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , DNA, Viral/analysis , Hospital Mortality , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Chi-Square Distribution , China/epidemiology , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Critical Illness/mortality , Databases, Factual , Disease Progression , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, University , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Survival Analysis
11.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 14(4): 474-475, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-602682
14.
Expert Rev Respir Med ; 14(8): 835-838, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-133651

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the role of essential organ-based comorbidities in the prognosis of COVID-19 patients. METHODS: All consecutive patients diagnosed with COVID-19 admitted to the Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University from 11 January to 16 March 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. RESULTS: A total of 212 COVID-19 patients were included. COVID-19 patients with heart, liver and kidneycomorbidity, compared to patients without related comorbidities, were more likely to have cardiac injuries [9.1%(3/33) vs 2.2%(4/179), P = 0.043], liver injuries [13.0%(3/23) vs 3.2%(6/189), P = 0.027], kidney injury [54.5%(6/11) vs 2.0%(4/201), P < 0.001], and higher risk of mortality [Heart-comorbidity: 6.1%(2/33) vs 0.6%(1/179), P = 0.014; Liver-comorbidity: 8.7%(2/23) vs 0.5%(1/189), P = 0.002; Kidney-comorbidity: 27.3%(3/11) vs 1.0%(2/201), P < 0.001. Mortality was higher in patients with more severe Grade of organ injuries [Heart-injury: P = 0.044; Liver-injury: P = 0.020; Kidney-injury: P = 0.030]. CONCLUSION: Male, older, co-existing of heart, liver, and kidney comorbidities, especially those with severe Grade organ injuries, had a poor prognosis after SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Comorbidity , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL